Forordningen om digitale tjenester betragtning 102
Dansk sprogudgave pr. 2026-10-06 tier 2 Forordning (EU) 2022/2065, CELEX 32022R2065
For at lette en effektiv og konsekvent anvendelse af de i denne forordning fastsatte forpligtelser, der kan kræve gennemførelse ad elektronisk vej, er det vigtigt at fremme frivillige standarder for visse tekniske procedurer, hvor industrien kan bidrage til udviklingen af standardiserede metoder med henblik på at støtte udbyderne af formidlingstjenester med overholdelse af denne forordning, f.eks. mulighed for indgivelse af anmeldelser, herunder via applikationsprogrammeringsgrænseflader, eller standarder vedrørende vilkår og betingelser eller standarder vedrørende revisioner eller standarder vedrørende interoperabilitet af reklamedatabaser. Desuden kan sådanne standarder omfatte standarder vedrørende onlinereklamer, anbefalingssystemer, tilgængelighed og beskyttelse af mindreårige online. Udbydere af formidlingstjenester kan frit vedtage standarderne, men vedtagelsen heraf er ikke ensbetydende med, at denne forordning er overholdt. Ved at levere bedste praksis kan sådanne standarder samtidig navnlig være nyttige for relativt små udbydere af formidlingstjenester. I standarderne kunne der i givet fald skelnes mellem forskellige former for ulovligt indhold eller forskellige typer formidlingstjenester.
English language version pr. 2026-10-06 tier 2 Forordning (EU) 2022/2065, CELEX 32022R2065
To facilitate the effective and consistent application of the obligations in this Regulation that may require implementation through technological means, it is important to promote voluntary standards covering certain technical procedures, where the industry can help develop standardised means to support providers of intermediary services in complying with this Regulation, such as allowing the submission of notices, including through application programming interfaces, or standards related to terms and conditions or standards relating to audits, or standards related to the interoperability of advertisement repositories. In addition, such standards could include standards related to online advertising, recommender systems, accessibility and the protection of minors online. Providers of intermediary services are free to adopt the standards, but their adoption does not presume compliance with this Regulation. At the same time, by providing best practices, such standards could in particular be useful for relatively small providers of intermediary services. The standards could distinguish between different types of illegal content or different types of intermediary services, as appropriate.